Bell v Tavistock
2020 High Court
Commentary
- Naomi Cunningham “Puberty Blockers and Parental Consent”, Legal Feminist
- The Transparency Project Bell v Tavistock in the High Court: an explainer
Sex Matters
-
- Updates
- Legal opinion says promotion policy discriminates on basis of gender-critical beliefs
- Getting “sex” right in digital verification services
- The Cass Review is a damning indictment of what the NHS has been doing to children
- How gender ideology broke the census
- “Misgendering” and the Scottish Hate Crime Act
- View more
-
- Take action
- Ask your MP to read our report and call for action now
- Kickstart our next campaign
- Update your child’s school on the latest guidance
- Use School Check to find out if a school has been captured by gender-identity ideology
- Call out bad reporting on sex and gender with Bad Media Watch
- Donate to Sex Matters
- Leave us a donation in your will
- Sign up
- View more
-
- Resources
- For employers and employees
- Sector networks
- For journalists
- For MPs
- For parents
- For service providers
- For teachers
- Campaign – sex in the Equality Act
- FAQs – sex and gender
- FAQs – gender reassignment
- Groups defending sex-based rights
- Attacks on those defending sex-based rights
- Intimidation, threats and violence by trans-rights activists
- Log of academics targeted
- Timeline of efforts to sabotage the UK’s equality watchdog
- Transactivist violence – on film
- Guidance
- Reports
- Submissions
- Webinars
-
Search