Subject: Request for review of workplace toilet facilities policy
Template email to raise concerns about workplace toilets
This template email is designed to help you clearly and confidently raise concerns about workplace toilet policies: the removal of single-sex facilities; the introduction of “gender-neutral” or unisex toilets; or unclear guidance on who is permitted to use which amenities.
If you are concerned about facilities that are not in a workplace, use our other template emails for:
- the removal of single-sex facilities or unclear guidance on who is permitted to use them
- proposed unisex changing rooms or toilets.
Once you know your rights, use this sample text to start an informal conversation, adapted to submit a formal grievance, or amended to escalate a previous complaint.
How to use it
- Use the text below, or edit the same text in a Google doc (click Use template at top right) or Word document.
- Copy and paste into an email, with the optional sections to suit your own situation.
- Replace the placeholder text in [square brackets].
- Attach our Workplace facilities factsheet.
- Send it as an informal query or adapt it to form part of a formal grievance if needed.
Write the email
Dear [Manager’s name / Human resources department]
I am writing to raise concerns about the [current / proposed] provision of toilet facilities in our workplace. I do so with the intention of seeking clarity and ensuring our compliance with legal obligations.
Under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 and the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, employers are required to provide “suitable and sufficient” sanitary conveniences. This includes providing separate facilities for men and women, except where each convenience is in a self-contained room with a door that can be secured from the inside. These obligations are not optional and are legally binding.
The Equality Act 2010 protects employees from discrimination and harassment on the basis of sex and belief. The UK Supreme Court clarified in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers (April 2025) that “single-sex” means biological sex. This position has been reinforced by the Equality and Human Rights Commission and has direct implications for how workplace toilet facilities are designated and used.
• Facilities marked as single-sex must be restricted to people of that biological sex.
• Permitting use based on gender identity invalidates single-sex provision.
• Trans individuals must be provided for but not at the expense of removing single-sex access for others.
• Employers should ensure they have a lawful, clear, and consistently applied policy.
To support this, I am attaching a factsheet outlining employer responsibilities under UK law.
Add this if policies allow self-ID toilet use
I am aware of current workplace [policies] [and training] that state that individuals may use facilities based on gender identity rather than biological sex. This undermines the lawful provision of single-sex facilities and may result in indirect discrimination or harassment.
I believe that this should be reviewed in the light of current legislation, workplace safety regulations and case law including Earl Shilton Town Council v Miller, which found that forcing women to share space with male colleagues in inadequate facilities amounted to direct sex discrimination.
Add this if toilets are being refurbished or changed
I am concerned about [insert specific issue: the relabelling of single-sex toilets as gender-neutral, the removal of separate male and female toilets, ambiguous signage]. This creates uncertainty and anxiety for many employees, particularly women and religious minorities, and breaches legal requirements.
Since October 2024, England’s Building Regulations (Schedule 1, Requirement T1) require single-sex toilets in all new-builds and refurbishments wherever space allows. This makes the legal expectations around separate provision even more explicit.
I respectfully request that [company name]:
• reviews its policies and signage relating to toilet use
• confirms that single-sex facilities are designated for use based on biological sex only
• considers whether an equality impact assessment has been completed
• ensures that any unisex or “gender-neutral” facilities are additional and are fully enclosed and clearly marked.
Add this for disinformation clarification
I am aware that since the Supreme Court ruling and the EHRC’s updated guidance, there has been a significant amount of public disinformation from organisations such as Stonewall and the Good Law Project suggesting that the ruling is not yet the law or the guidance is unlawful. These claims are inaccurate and the legal position is that while trans individuals are protected under the characteristic of gender reassignment, the lawful provision of single-sex spaces based on biological sex is both permitted and in many cases required.
It is essential that workplace policies are based on the law and not on ideological misinformation.
Add this if you want an informal resolution
I hope this matter can be addressed informally in the first instance, but I reserve the right to escalate the concern through formal grievance channels if necessary.
Add this if you are raising a formal grievance
I have attempted to resolve this informally by [briefly state what steps you’ve taken, such as “raising the issue with my manager on [date]”], but the matter remains unresolved. I am therefore submitting this letter as a formal grievance under the organisation’s grievance policy.
Sign off
I look forward to a written response within seven days or in accordance with the company’s procedures. Please let me know if you require any further information or would like to arrange a meeting.
Attach factsheet
Now sign and send it.
Excuses
If your employer responds with excuses, we have some responses you can use.
Feedback
Tell us about your complaint, whether you succeed or hit a brick wall. We will treat it in confidence and will not share anything publicly without your consent.
It’s useful for us to track how organisations are responding to the Supreme Court’s clarification of the law, and to have an idea of compliance and non-compliance by sector.